Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sixty Wall Street, Appellant, v. Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 543 · caselaw · US
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sixty Wall Street, Appellant, v. Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent
186 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sixty Wall Street, Appellant, v. Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.
People ex rel. Sixty Wall Street v. Kelsey, 114 App. Div. 909, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1906;
decided October 23, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11, 1906, which affirmed a determination of the defendant in assessing a franchise tax against the relator.
Sanford Robinson and Guy Fairfax Cary for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Horace McGuire of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.