General
Simon Rothschild, Respondent, v. The Rio Grande Western Railway Company, Appellant
164 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Simon Rothschild, Respondent, v. The Rio Grande Western Railway Company, Appellant.
BotJmMld v. Bio Brande W. By. Bo., 17 App. Div. 635, affirmed.
(Argued October 18, 1900;
decided November 2, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 17, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Roger A. Pryor for appellant.
George Hoadly and William Strauss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Follett, J. (84 Hun, 103).
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Parker, Ch. J.