Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WHITEHOUSE TRUCKING, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1967 — 388 U.S. 453 · caselaw · US
General
WHITEHOUSE TRUCKING, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
388 U.S. 453·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WHITEHOUSE TRUCKING, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1255.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Robert P. Mone and James M. Burtch for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Sha-piro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for Hennis Freight Lines, Inc., et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.