Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Manning v. Ragen, Warden; Poppe v. Ragen, Warden; Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden; Watkins v. California; Williams v. New York; Anderson v. Missouri; Reeder v. Ragen, Warden; Bautz v. Ragen, Warden; Wells v. Ragen, Warden; Kellogg v. Miller, Warden; Banks v. Ragen, Warden; Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden, 1949 — 338 U.S. 852 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Manning v. Ragen, Warden; Poppe v. Ragen, Warden; Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden; Watkins v. California; Williams v. New York; Anderson v. Missouri; Reeder v. Ragen, Warden; Bautz v. Ragen, Warden; Wells v. Ragen, Warden; Kellogg v. Miller, Warden; Banks v. Ragen, Warden; Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden
338 U.S. 852·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 123, Misc.
No. 127, Misc.
No. 132, Misc.
No. 136, Misc.
No. 142, Misc.
No. 144, Misc.
No. 145, Misc.
Manning v. Ragen, Warden. Poppe v. Ragen, Warden. Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden. Watkins v. California. Williams v. New York. Anderson v. Missouri. Reeder v. Ragen, Warden. Bautz v. Ragen, Warden. Wells v. Ragen, Warden. Kellogg v. Miller, Warden. Banks v. Ragen, Warden. Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden.
[MAJORITY]
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Supreme Court of Michigan ;
District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California;
Supreme Court of New York;
Supreme Court of Missouri;
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
No. 147, Misc.
No. 148, Misc.
No. 149, Misc.
No. 154, Misc.
No. 158, Misc.
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois;
Supreme Court of Wyoming;
Supreme Court of Illinois; and
Supreme Court of Illinois. The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are severally denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.