Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. et al. v. Muscoda Local No. 123 et al., 1943 — 320 U.S. 731 · caselaw · US
General
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. et al. v. Muscoda Local No. 123 et al.
320 U.S. 731·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 409.
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. et al. v. Muscoda Local No. 123 et al.
November 15, 1943.
Messrs. Borden Burr, E. L. All, R. T. Rives, and T. F. Patton for petitioners. Messrs. Crampton Harris, Lee Pressman, and J. Q. Smith for Muscoda Local No. 123 et al.; and Solicitor General Fahy, Messrs. Douglas B. Maggs and Irving J. Levy, and Miss Bessie Margolin for the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, TJ. S. Dept, of Labor,— respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.