General
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Canadian River Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
323 U.S. 807·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 379. No. 380.
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Canadian River Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
January 2, 1945.
Messrs. Wm. A. Dougherty, Elmer L. Brock, and E. R. Campbell for petitioner in No. 379.
Messrs. Charles H. Keffer and John P. Akolt for petitioner in No. 380. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Charles V. Shannon, Malcolm Lindsey, Thomas H. Gibson, and Louis J. O’Marr, Attorney General of Wyoming, for the Federal Power Commission et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
In No. 380 the petition for rehearing is granted and the order entered November 13, ante, p. 700, is vacated. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is granted limited to questions 1, 2, 3, and 8 presented by the petition for the writ.