Contracts · MBE-tested

ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, WARDEN

390 U.S. 45620 L. Ed. 2d 27·Supreme Court of the United States·1968

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, WARDEN. No. 700. Argued March 6, 1968. Decided March 25, 1968. /. Brad Reed argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Ed R. Davies argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. McCanLess, Attorney General of Tennessee. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.