Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jose de Carricarte, Respondent, v. Maria Josefa Garcia Blanco de Lastres, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Jose de Carricarte, Respondent, v. Maria Josefa Garcia Blanco de Lastres, Appellant
121 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jose de Carricarte, Respondent, v. Maria Josefa Garcia Blanco de Lastres, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
This case presented the same question and was argued and decided with de Carricarte v. Blanco, ante, page 230.
The mem. of decision is as follows:
“We make the same disposition of this appeal as in the. case of Carricarte v. Jose G. Blanco, argued at the same time herewith.
“ The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered; unless the plaintiff consent to reduce his judgment by deducting and striking therefrom three years interest upon the sum of $3,568, found by the referee as the value of his services, in which event, the judgment as thus modified must be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other upon the appeal to the General Term and to this court.”