Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bartholow v. Trustees, 1881 — 105 U.S. 6 · caselaw · US
General
Bartholow v. Trustees
105 U.S. 626 L. Ed. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1881
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bartholow v. Trustees.
The judgment rendered in an action at law where the judges of the Circuit . Court were opposed in opinion cannot be re-examined here otherwise than on a writ of error.
On a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. -
Submitted by Mr. John D. Stevenson for the plaintiff.
There was no opposing counsel.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
All the. questions certified in this case are-answered in the negative, on the authority of Weightman v. Clark, 103 U. S. 256. As the judgment was in accordance with this opinion, it would have been in all respects affirmed if 'the case had been brought here by writ of error. We find no such writ, however, and on that account dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction. Under sect. 693 of the Revised Statutes, final judgments or decrees of the Circuit Courts in civil suits or proceedings, wherein there has been'a division of opinion of the judges, are only reviewable here on w'rit of error or appeal. The sixth section of the act of 1802, c. 31 (2 Stat. 159), which allowed the questions to be certified up- before judgment, was superseded by the first section of the act of July 1, 1872, c. 255 (17 Stat. 196).
Suit dismissed.