Contracts · MBE-tested
PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, and Cresson-Morris Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. S. S. HEPWORTH COMPANY and Edith M. Horstman, Plaintiffs-Appellees
45 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, and Cresson-Morris Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. S. S. HEPWORTH COMPANY and Edith M. Horstman, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 4387.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1931.
Joshua R. H. Potts, of Chicago, 111. (T. Bertram Humphries, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.
Hubert Ilowson and Howson & llowson, all of New York City, for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This ease has had our careful consideration. We are satisfied it was correctly decided by the court below. 37 F.(2d) 732. The thoroughness of the discussion of the salient points in the case by the trial judge is so full that we shall not attempt to put in other language what he has already so well said.
The case is affirmed on his opinion.