Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Allen v. Illinois; Gendusa v. Louisiana, 1939 — 308 U.S. 511 · caselaw · US
General
Allen v. Illinois; Gendusa v. Louisiana
308 U.S. 511·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 406.
No. 448.
Allen v. Illinois. Gendusa v. Louisiana.
October 23, 1939.
Mr. Wm. Scott Stewart for appellant in No. 406. Mr. M. C. Scharff for appellant in No. 448. No appearance for appellees.
[MAJORITY — .Per Curiam;]
.Per Curiam;
The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motions for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis are also denied.
Reported below: No. 406, 368 Ill. 368; 14 N. E. 2d 397; and No. 448, 193 La. 59; 190 So. 332.