Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Atlanta Journal Company et al., 1913 — 229 U.S. 605 · caselaw · US
General
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Atlanta Journal Company et al.
229 U.S. 605·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 253.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Atlanta Journal Company et al.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia.
Argued April 24, 1913.
Decided May 5, 1913.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Alex. C. King and Mr. Chas. T. Hopkins for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of United States v. Patten, 226 U. S. 525, 535, and cases cited, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia.