Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION OF LOUISIANA, et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 114 · caselaw · US
General
SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION OF LOUISIANA, et al.
361 U.S. 114·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION OF LOUISIANA, et al.
No. 423.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Saul Stone and Paul O. H. Pigman for appellant.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George M. Ponder, First Assistant Attorney General, and N. Clebum Dalton, Special Assistant Attorney General, for McCrory, and Frank H. Peterman, for Blu-Ribon Dairies, Inc., et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.