Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Marie A. Leary et al., as Executors of Sylvester N. Leary, Deceased, Appellants. Mary C. Leary, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James D. Leary, Deceased, Appellant; Hendricks Brothers, Respondents, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Marie A. Leary et al., as Executors of Sylvester N. Leary, Deceased, Appellants. Mary C. Leary, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James D. Leary, Deceased, Appellant; Hendricks Brothers, Respondents
189 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Marie A. Leary et al., as Executors of Sylvester N. Leary, Deceased, Appellants. Mary C. Leary, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James D. Leary, Deceased, Appellant; Hendricks Brothers, Respondents.
Matter of Leary, 120 App. Div. 880, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1907;
decided October 22, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28, 1907, which affirmed a decree of the Hew York County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of the executors of Sylvester H. Leary, deceased.
Albert A. Wray for executors, appellants.
David MeClure for Mary C. Leary, appellant.
L. E. Warren for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, with leave' to apply to the Surrogate’s Court to correct the mathematical error in computation; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.