Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis Van Allen, Appellant, v. Charles M. Peabody et al., as Executors of William H. Peabody, Deceased, Respondents, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 532 · caselaw · US
General
Lewis Van Allen, Appellant, v. Charles M. Peabody et al., as Executors of William H. Peabody, Deceased, Respondents
187 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lewis Van Allen, Appellant, v. Charles M. Peabody et al., as Executors of William H. Peabody, Deceased, Respondents.
Van Allen v. Peabody, 113 App. Div. 57, appeal dismissed.
(Argued January 7, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Motiow to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 6, 1906, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the required undertaking had not been served or filed.
William D. Van Pelt for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.