Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 1944 — 323 U.S. 687 · caselaw · US
General
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
323 U.S. 687·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 189.
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
October 9, 1944.
Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Edward M. Day, and Gay H. Brown for petitioner.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Joseph B. Goldman, Charles V. Shannon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, and Howell Purdue for respondent.
Briefs were filed by Mr. Francis A. Pallotti, Attorney General, on behalf of the State of Connecticut, and Mr. John E. Benton, on behalf of the Connecticut Public Utilities Commissioners et aL, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.