Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fannie Bean Carrerre, Appellant, v. Robert G. Dun et al., Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 573 · caselaw · US
General
Fannie Bean Carrerre, Appellant, v. Robert G. Dun et al., Respondents
159 N.Y. 573·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fannie Bean Carrerre, Appellant, v. Robert G. Dun et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 22 App. Div. 622.
(Argued June 19, 1899;
decided June 23, 1899.)
Motion for leave to file undertaking nunc fro imnc on appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 26, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at a Trial Term.
Wilson Lee Cannon, Jr., for motion.
Douglass di Minim opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.