General
Cogswell v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co.
328 U.S. 820·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1140.
Cogswell v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co.
May 20, 1946.
Royal W. Irwin for petitioner.
Edward W. Rawlins for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition is granted, except as to the question whether the jury could have found respondent guilty of a violation of Rule 152 of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The judgment is reversed. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S. 54, 67-8; Bailey v. Central Vermont R. Co., 319 U. S. 350, 353-4; Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U. S. 645.