Contracts · MBE-tested
SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM
376 U.S. 33911 L. Ed. 2d 766·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.
Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.
J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U. S. 196; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U. S. 375.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.