Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission et al. v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., 1963 — 372 U.S. 927 · caselaw · US
General
Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission et al. v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
372 U.S. 927·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 146.
Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission et al. v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 371 U. S. 809, to the Supreme Court of Colorado. The motion of the State of California for leave to argue, as amicus curiae, is granted and twenty minutes are allotted for that purpose. Counsel for the respondent is allotted an additional twenty minutes to argue this case.