Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Richard N. Peterson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schuyler S. Wheeler, Individually, as Executor of Ella A. Wheeler, Deceased, and as Administrator of the Estate of Richard S. Wheeler, Deceased, Respondent, and Mary A. Stephens et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Richard N. Peterson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schuyler S. Wheeler, Individually, as Executor of Ella A. Wheeler, Deceased, and as Administrator of the Estate of Richard S. Wheeler, Deceased, Respondent, and Mary A. Stephens et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
173 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Richard N. Peterson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schuyler S. Wheeler, Individually, as Executor of Ella A. Wheeler, Deceased, and as Administrator of the Estate of Richard S. Wheeler, Deceased, Respondent, and Mary A. Stephens et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
United States Trust Go. v. Wheeler, 73 App. Div. 389, affirmed.
(Argued January 28, 1903;
decided February 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 18, 1902, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Richard N. Peterson, deceased.
Jacob W. Kahn and Edwin M. Wight for appellants.
William K. Cohen and Messmore Kendall for defendant, respondent.
Edward W. Sheldon for plaintiff, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.