Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albany Exchange Savings Bank, Respondent, v. William C. Brass et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
Albany Exchange Savings Bank, Respondent, v. William C. Brass et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
171 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albany Exchange Savings Bank, Respondent, v. William C. Brass et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Albany Exchange Savings Bank v. Brass, 57 App. Div. 370, affirmed.
(Argued June 17, 1902;
decided June 27, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 16, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee:
Edwin Countryman, P. E. Du Bois and R. W. Brass for appellants.
William L. Learned and A. V. De Witt, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.