General
Louis Rothschild, Respondent, v. Henry Allen et al., Appellants
180 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Rothschild, Respondent, v. Henry Allen et al., Appellants.
BotTmhild v. Allen, 90 App. Div. 233, affirmed.
(Argued February 2, 1905;
decided February 21, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 28,1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John J. Crawford and Charles H. Brush for appellants.
William J. Barr for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.