Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Respublica versus Askew, 1792 — 2 U.S. 189 · caselaw · US
General
Respublica versus Askew
2 U.S. 1892 Dall. 189·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Respublica versus Askew.
THE defendant was indicted for a libel; and at the last Nisi Prius, retracted his plea and submitted, protesting his innocence, &c. He now appeared to receive judgment, and his own affidavit was offered to be read in mitigation of the fine.
[MAJORITY — by the Court:]
But,
by the Court:
—It has been usual to hear the defendant without oath ; but we have never known his affidavit received, although it goes only in mitigation of the fine.
Affidavit refused.