General
Joseph Hannigan, Respondent, v. The Union Warehouse Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
157 N.Y. 711·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Hannigan, Respondent, v. The Union Warehouse Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Ilanniganv. Union WareJiovse Go., 3 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued December 5, 1898;
decided January 10, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 15, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William Allen Butler and John JSToiman for appellant.
James D. Bell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., dissenting, and Bartlett and Martin, JJ., not voting.