Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
S. D. Harper, Plaintiff in Error, v. Grant Victor, United States Marshal, etc., 1913 — 229 U.S. 605 · caselaw · US
General
S. D. Harper, Plaintiff in Error, v. Grant Victor, United States Marshal, etc.
229 U.S. 605·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 238.
S. D. Harper, Plaintiff in Error, v. Grant Victor, United States Marshal, etc.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District .of Oklahoma.
Submitted April 18, 1913.
Decided May 5, 1913.
Mr. Jas. S. Davenport for the plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Fisher v. Baker, 203 U. S. 174, 182, and cases cited, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.