Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dennis Nugent, Appellant, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Respondent, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 709 · caselaw · US
General
Dennis Nugent, Appellant, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Respondent
147 N.Y. 709·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dennis Nugent, Appellant, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Respondent.
Reported below, 61 Hun, 626. '
(Argued October 10, 1895;
decided October 29, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 7, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Charles Fr anais Bates and Joba Chefwood for appellant.
Fherett P. Wheeler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Finch, Gray, O’Brien and Hai&ht, JJ., concur; Andrews, Oh. J., Peckham and Bartlett, JJ., dissent.