Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PORTO RICO FERTILIZER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Pedro GANDIA, Defendant, Appellee, 1925 — 7 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
PORTO RICO FERTILIZER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Pedro GANDIA, Defendant, Appellee
7 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PORTO RICO FERTILIZER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Pedro GANDIA, Defendant, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
October 23, 1925.)
No. 1876.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico.
Cayetano Coll y Cuchi, of San Juan, Porto Rico, for appellant. Jose A. Poventud, of New York City, for appellee.
Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, March 19, 1925, conforms to the mandate of this court of February 14, 1025, and the order is: Judgment affirmed, with, costs to the appellee. See, also, 2 F. (2d) 611.