Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles G. Landon et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Mary N. Townshend et al., Respondents, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Charles G. Landon et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Mary N. Townshend et al., Respondents
133 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles G. Landon et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Mary N. Townshend et al., Respondents.
(Argued May 23, 1892;
decided June 7, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 31, 1892, Which affirmed an order of Special Term which vacated a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and granted a new trial.
E. H. Landon for appellants.
John Townshend for respondents,
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.