Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Klepinger et al. v. Rhodes, 1944 — 322 U.S. 734 · caselaw · US
General
Klepinger et al. v. Rhodes
322 U.S. 734·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 809.
Klepinger et al. v. Rhodes.
May 1, 1944.
Mr. Patrick H. Loughran for petitioners.
Mr. Jacob N. Halper for respondent.
Messrs. Lawrence Koenigsberger, Hugh H. Obear, Paul B. Cromelin, and John J. Carmody, constituting a committee of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia, filed a brief, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.