Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sobell v. United States, 1957 — 355 U.S. 873 · caselaw · US
General
Sobell v. United States
355 U.S. 873·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 440 and 441.
Sobell v. United States.
Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy, Marshall Perlin and Benjamin Dreyfus for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Carl G. Cohen for the United States. Daniel G. Marshall filed a brief for Urey et al., as amici curiae, urging that a writ of certiorari be granted.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion for leave to file brief of Dr. Harold C. Urey et al., as amici curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.