Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac Fenno et al., Appellants, v. John W. Hannan, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Respondents, 1891 — 127 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac Fenno et al., Appellants, v. John W. Hannan, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Respondents
127 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac Fenno et al., Appellants, v. John W. Hannan, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Submitted March 6, 1891;
decided April 21, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made June 25, 1890, which denied a motion for a new trial and ordered judgment in favor of defendants upon a verdict directed by the court.
Fanning <& Williams for appellants.
Da/oicl Fays for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Potter and Bradley, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.