Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Elizur V. Foote et al., as Executors, etc., 1894 — 141 N.Y. 561 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Elizur V. Foote et al., as Executors, etc.
141 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Elizur V. Foote et al., as Executors, etc.
(Submitted December 21, 1893;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 17, 1893, which affirmed a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kew York county settling^ the accounts of the executors of Henry S. Valentine, deceased.
James F. Malcolm and James B. Lockwood for appellants.
John Delahunty for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Babtlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.