Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCINTILLA MAGNETO COMPANY, Inc., and American Brown Boveri Electric Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, 1929 — 36 F.2d 422 · caselaw · US
Corporations
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCINTILLA MAGNETO COMPANY, Inc., and American Brown Boveri Electric Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
36 F.2d 422·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCINTILLA MAGNETO COMPANY, Inc., and American Brown Boveri Electric Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 18, 1929.
No. 44.
Victor S. Beam and Thomas J. Byrne, both of New York City, for appellant.
Franklin M. Warden, of Chicago, Ill., Lawrence K. Sager, of New York City, S. Michael Pineles, of Chicago, Ill., and White & Case, of New York City, for appellees.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree [36 F.(2d) 419] affirmed.