Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thompson v. Oklahoma et al., 1979 — 439 U.S. 1121 · caselaw · US
General
Thompson v. Oklahoma et al.
439 U.S. 1121·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins,
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-5532.
Thompson v. Oklahoma et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[DISSENT — Mr. Justice Brennan,]
Mr. Justice Brennan,
with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins,
dissenting.
In this proceeding pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2254, petitioner presents the same questions presented by him in No. 76-5283, cert, denied, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977). For the reasons expressed in my dissent from the denial of certiorari in that case, I would grant the petition for certiorari and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.