General
Ellen J. Coxhead, Respondent, v. Albert L. Johnson et al., Appellants
156 N.Y. 680·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ellen J. Coxhead, Respondent, v. Albert L. Johnson et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 80 App. Div. 605; 81 App. Div. 626.
(Argued June 6, 1898;
decided June 14, 1898.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal by permission from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 19, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the certificate allowing the appeal is insufficient; that the judgment is not appealable, and that no exceptions are presented for review.
Thomas E. Pearsall for motion.
Henry Yonge opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.