General
FARMERS' & MECHANICS' NAT. BANK OF FORT WORTH, Tex., Petitioner, v. W. W. WILKINSON, Trustee, Respondent
3 F.2d 876·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FARMERS’ & MECHANICS’ NAT. BANK OF FORT WORTH, Tex., Petitioner, v. W. W. WILKINSON, Trustee, Respondent.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 24, 1925.)
No. 4378.
Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; William H. Atwell, Judge.
J. A. Templeton, of Fort Worth, Tex., G. A. Stultz, of Wichita, Kan., Clay Cooke, of Fort Worth, Tex., and W. E. Spell, of Waco, Tex., for petitioner.
Stanley Boykin and H. C. Ray, both of Fort Worth, Tex. (C. M. Conner and Capps, Cantey, Hanger So Short, all of Fort Worth, Tex., and Orestes Mitchell, of St. Joseph, Mo., on the brief), for respondent.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — BRYAN, Circuit Judge.]
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
Applying the decision this day announced in the ease of W. W. Wilkinson, Trustee, v. J. L. Walker (No. 4346) 3 F.(2d) 872, the petition to superintend and revise in this case is denied.