General
Frank Work et al., Appellants, v. Dudley Tibbits, Impleaded, etc., et al., Respondents
133 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Work et al., Appellants, v. Dudley Tibbits, Impleaded, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 11, 1892;
decided April 26, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme 'Court in the first judicial department, made November 13 1891, which reversed an order denying a motion to vacate ■and set aside a judgment recovered by the plaintiffs herein, and directed that such judgment should be set aside as to the defendant Tibbits unless plaintiffs would consent to deduct from their judgment $4,538.75, in which case the order is affirmed.
F. F. Marbury for appellants.
Esek Gowen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.