Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners et al. v. Rosen, 1975 — 419 U.S. 1098 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners et al. v. Rosen
419 U.S. 1098·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
with whom Mr. Justice Rehnquist joins,
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 13, 1975
No. 74-380.
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners et al. v. Rosen.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. La.
[CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice White,]
Mr. Justice White,
with whom Mr. Justice Rehnquist joins,
concurring.
Under the compulsion of Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. Bolton, 410 U. S. 179 (1973), which in my view were erroneously decided, I join the affirmance.