Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rogers, as Mayor, and City of Denver v. Morgan, 1899 — 173 U.S. 702 · caselaw · US
General
Rogers, as Mayor, and City of Denver v. Morgan
173 U.S. 702·Supreme Court of the United States·1899
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 228.
Rogers, as Mayor, and City of Denver v. Morgan.
Error to the; United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 1899.
Decided March 13, 1899.
Mr. Plait Rogers and Mr. George Q. Richmond for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Willard Teller and Mr. H. M. Orahood for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed on the authority of Clark v. Kansas City, 172 U. S. 334; Kinnear v. Bausman, 172 U. S. 644, and cases cited.