Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1970 — 397 U.S. 937 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
397 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1045.
Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
William W. Brackett for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Gordon Gooch, and Peter H. Schifj for respondent Federal Power Commission; Howard C. Westwood, Herbert Dym, Kenneth Heady, John R. Rebman, and Willard P. Scott for respondents Phillips Petroleum Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.