Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1950 — 339 U.S. 917 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
339 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Certiorari Granted.
No. 596.
Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
C. A. 2d Cir.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari granted limited to Questions “2” and “3” presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.:
“2. Were the transfers made by the petitioner to her husband under a property settlement agreement dated February 27, 1943, incidental to a Nevada divorce, made for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth and thus not subject to gift tax?
Irwin N. Wilpon for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz for respondent.
“3. Were the transfers made by the petitioner to her husband in 1943, in payment and discharge of a legal obligation imposed by the judgment of the Nevada Court entered March 6, 1943, and thus not subject to gift tax?”