Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Myers et al. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.; and Myers et al. v. MacKenzie et al., 1937 — 302 U.S. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Myers et al. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.; and Myers et al. v. MacKenzie et al.
302 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 181.
No. 182.
Myers et al. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.; and Myers et al. v. MacKenzie et al.
October 11, 1937.
Solicitor General Reed and Mr. Charles Fahy for petitioners. Messrs. Frederick H. Wood, John L. Hall, Claude R. Branch, and E. Fontaine Brown for respondents in No. 181. Messrs. B. A. Brickley, Alexander G. Gould, and Oliver R. Waite for respondents in No. 182.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.
Reported below: 88 F. (2d) 154.