Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kinston Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. et al. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. et al., 1952 — 344 U.S. 866 · caselaw · US
General
Kinston Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. et al. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. et al.
344 U.S. 866·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 327.
Kinston Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. et al. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. et al.
Jesse A. Jones for petitioners.
Bethuel M. Webster and Francis H. Horan for the Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.; James Mullen, Walter E. Rogers and Albion Dunn for the Kins-ton Tobacco Co., Inc.; Horace G. Hitchcock and Victor S. Bryant for American Suppliers, Inc.; and William A. Lucas for the Imperial Tobacco Co., Ltd., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari denied.