Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WHEELER FISHER & CO., 1932 — 61 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WHEELER FISHER & CO.
61 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WHEELER FISHER & CO.
No. 4715.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 14, 1932.
See, also, 54 F.(2d) 294.
G. A. Youngqnist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Albert L. Hopkins, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for petitioner, counsel for respondent consenting thereto, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the petition for review filed in the above-entitled cause be, and the same is hereby, denied, and the anneal he, and tho same is hereby, dismissed, without costs.