General
BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS
387 U.S. 95·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS.
No. 1089.
Decided May 15, 1967.
Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.
Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.