Contracts · MBE-tested
Crow v. United States
404 U.S. 1009·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Mr. Justice Blackmun, with whom The Chief Justice joins, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in United States v. Bass, supra, at 351. Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 70-5267.
Crow v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Bass, ante, p. 336.
Mr. Justice Blackmun, with whom The Chief Justice joins, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in United States v. Bass, supra, at 351. Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.