General
Florence B. Schwaman, Respondent, v. Edgar I. Truax et al., Appellants
172 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence B. Schwaman, Respondent, v. Edgar I. Truax et al., Appellants.
Schwaman v. Truax, 53 App. Div. 626, affirmed.
(Argued November 17,1902;
decided December 2, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment entered ¡ February 26, 1901, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Charles IS. Patterson, A. J. Dillingham and Charles C. Van Kirk for appellants.
Judson -S. London, Robert J. London and John F. Clute for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray and Martin, JJ.