Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
THE Motor Vessel BESSEMER, Atlantic Refining Company, Claimant, and Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Owner of THE Dredge MANHATTAN, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 995 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
THE Motor Vessel BESSEMER, Atlantic Refining Company, Claimant, and Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Owner of THE Dredge MANHATTAN, Appellee
63 F.2d 995·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE Motor Vessel BESSEMER, Atlantic Refining Company, Claimant, and Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Owner of THE Dredge MANHATTAN, Appellee.
No. 4965.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
March 10, 1933.
Lewis, Adler & Laws, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Otto Wolff, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.
Edward W. Wells, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., and J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully studied the record, and the briefs "of the able and experienced proctors for the appellant a,nd the appellee. We have with equal care studied the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the learned judge who tried the cause in the court below. Discovering no error cither in his findings of fact or conclusions of law, with which we are in entire accord, the decree (3 F. Supp. 75) is affirmed upon his full and satisfactory opinion.