Contracts · MBE-tested
Allan McGILL v. UNITED STATES
73 F.2d 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Allan McGILL v. UNITED STATES.
No. 5265.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 22, 1934.
Allan M. McGill, of St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.
Stanley M. Ryan, U. S. Atty., and Harold E. Hanson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Madison, Wis.
Before EVANS and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges, and BINDLEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.']
PER CURIAM.'
Now this day come the parties by their counsel and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments by Mr. Allan M. McGill, appellant, and by Mr. Harold J. Hansen, counsel for appellee, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.